Wednesday 14 October 2026 · Northstar Projects Group
Organisation overview
Five projects, six impact lenses, one maturity picture. Start with what needs attention.
Active projects
High-significance impacts
Forecast project carbon
Projects above carbon budget
Organisational maturity
Current vs target across the six domains
Overall indicator
·
Requires attention
Concrete issues, by project
No project has an open critical issue.
Projects
| Project | Stage | Relevant lenses | Carbon forecast / budget | Open issues |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| / |
Upcoming gate reviews
· suggested:
Projects
Impacts
Open actions
Forecast
No matching projects
Change the filter or create a new project.
Organisational Maturity Assessment
How capable is the organisation of enabling sustainable project delivery? 6 domains, 36 questions.
Maturity levels
Current maturity
Evidence gap
Current
Target
Gap
Strengths
Priority gaps (target gap of 2 or more)
No priority gaps.
Evidence warnings
Maturity is not reduced automatically. Warnings flag claims that need supporting evidence.
Evidence gap
No evidence warnings.
How this plan is built
Each action comes from an explicit question-to-intervention mapping. Candidates are ordered by maturity gap, then governance constraints, then foundational capabilities, then lower effort. No weighted score is used. Showing the top five of candidates.
Finding ():
Why:
Expected result:
Project Carbon
Estimates greenhouse-gas consequences of project delivery and outputs to support lower-carbon decisions. This is not a corporate GHG inventory.
Sum of project boundaries
Different boundaries are summed here
Portfolio totals add project delivery and project output boundaries for orientation only. Open each project to see its boundary.
| Project | Boundary | Baseline | Budget | Forecast | Actual | Position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Demonstration factors only
Emission factor registry
| ID | Factor | Category | Value | Geography | Year / version | Quality | Licence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demo |
Toolkit
Structured workflows grouped by the five questions.
Reports and exports
Concise, decision-oriented reports and structured registers.
Registers
Organisation settings
| Member | Role | Projects |
|---|---|---|
Default requirements from the Sustainably gate model. Configurable per organisation in a later release.
Maturity thresholds
Initial product design rule. Requires empirical validation.
Lens relevance rules
Deterministic. Users may override with a reason.
High two or more Clearly relevant, or one Clearly relevant plus a profile trigger.
Moderate one Clearly relevant without trigger, or two or more Potentially relevant.
Low no Clearly relevant and at most one Potentially relevant.
Uncertain two or more Insufficient information and nothing Clearly relevant.
What should we do next?
Generated from project data by explicit rules
Nothing requires attention.
Project profile
Type
Budget band
Geography
Countries
Team size
Procurement
Travel
Digital intensity
Stakeholder reach
Assessment
Screening
significant impacts
relevant lenses
Actions
high priority
overdue
unassigned
Carbon
KPIs
active indicators
require an update
Governance
Stage:
Next gate:
Sustainably Impact Lens
Relevance by lens. No single project sustainability score is calculated.
Detailed questions
System classification
Detailed questions
Shown because this lens is relevant. Follow-up questions appear only when needed.
No detailed questions required
Impact Register
What matters and what can we influence?
| Impact | Direction | Significance | Influence | Evidence | Owner | Status | Rule flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No owner |
No Impact Items yet
Complete the screening for relevant lenses, then create Impact Items from your structured answers.
Action Register
What should we do?
| Action | Type | Priority | Effort | Due | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overdue |
No actions yet
Actions are proposed when Impact Items meet the action rules, for example a negative impact with High significance.
No carbon boundary defined
Every estimate needs a boundary. Choose project delivery, project output, a decision scenario or a custom boundary.
Boundary
Included: · Excluded:
Baseline, budget, forecast and actual
Each state is shown separately and never combined.
Carbon budget history
No carbon budget recorded.
Add carbon activity
Activity data × emission factor = kgCO2e. Units must be compatible.
Route distance is not calculated automatically.
Potential duplicate activity
Carbon activity register
| State | Activity | Scenario | Quantity | Factor snapshot | Data quality | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Demo |
No carbon activities recorded yet.
Assumption register
No assumptions recorded.
Missing data
Missing quantities are never invented.
Why needed:
Possible source:
Effect:
No missing data recorded.
KPI Register
How will we know?
| Indicator | Level | Baseline | Target | Current | Progress | Frequency | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No indicators yet
Start with what you want to measure. The KPI Builder suggests indicators from the Sustainably library.
Risk & Opportunity Register
Exportable to the project risk register.
| Type | Title | Source | Probability | Impact / value | Response | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
No risks or opportunities recorded.
Stakeholder impact matrix
Influence over the project vs impact from the project
Impact from project →
High vulnerability
Stakeholder register
| Group | Direction | Vulnerability | Engagement |
|---|---|---|---|
No stakeholder groups mapped yet.
| Criterion | Importance | |
|---|---|---|
Estimated scenario difference, Physical vs Hybrid: 11.7 tCO2e. This is not classified as an offset or a corporate Scope 1, 2 or 3 reduction.
No decision comparisons
Compare two to five alternatives against cost, carbon, accessibility, stakeholder value and other criteria. The trade-offs are shown and you record the decision.
Requirements are read from existing project data. Nothing is re-entered.
| Requirement | Evidence from project | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Critical |
Suggested outcome (deterministic rule)
Only an authorised reviewer records the formal decision. The suggestion is stored alongside it.
Gate history
:
No gate decisions recorded.
Closure and lessons learned
What should change next time?
Expected result
Impact compared with expectation
Benefits evidenced
Lessons from this project
No lessons yet. Lessons from other projects appear in the knowledge resource in a later release.